🔗 Share this article

An unexpected connection on LinkedIn. An offer of employment from a recruiter, probably a young woman, operating from China. The chance to earn around £20,000 part-time writing a handful of geopolitical reports for a firm from China peppered with “non-public” or “insider” information. Compensation in cryptocurrency or physical money preferred.

It may seem clear, on this telling, that an element about this approach would be amiss. However, Beijing's powerful intelligence agency continues to view it valuable to deploy headhunters to attempt this – prompting the domestic spy agency to warn repeatedly about their activity online.

Large-Scale Approaches on Social Media

Last year, the head of MI5 Ken McCallum said operatives from China were contacting UK citizens on the platform on an unprecedented scale, at a frequency of ten thousand over the previous two and a half years, attempting to obtain governmental, commercial, military and scientific secrets. However a fresh campaign targeting politicians and parliament has led the spy agency to take further action.

An espionage alert was issued on Tuesday via the administrative teams of Lindsay Hoyle and his Lords counterpart: a brief presentation after the persistent attempts of certain individuals and other operatives to contact MPs, peers, their staffers, economists, research organizations – anybody who might provide information.

Intelligence Approach and Legal Changes

In the curious manner of British intelligence, there was no official release of the security advice from MI5 or the Home Office. But the agency knew its advisory document would leak once it was emailed out to Westminster. Republishing it in the media helps the wider public better identify communications with a deceptive intent.

This warning has the effect of flushing out more information from within Westminster, although that is not MI5’s primary purpose. The service wants public figures to recognize that just because exchanges on professional networks are not as toxic as on other social platforms, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is domestic spy agency believed to have been responding to any specific incident in parliament, although the recent actions occur after the awkward collapse of the legal case of a former parliamentary aide an individual and his associate Christopher Berry on a technicality in recent months.

Both individuals had been charged of working for China – a allegation they rejected – but inability to complete a trial under the now repealed previous legislation resulted in warnings that British democracy had been insufficiently defended.

Revised Legislation and China's Strategic Interests

Legislation has now been changed, and the security briefing contains a note of its successor: “Individuals involved in spying operations face substantial criminal penalties under the National Security Act.” This constitutes a crime if a person participates in behavior that is or is likely to “materially assist a foreign intelligence service”.

An obvious inquiry, though, is what Beijing has to achieve. An elected representative who is outside ministerial roles will have restricted access of classified material, and an contact of theirs less so. But the Chinese government is also interested in the legislative body: for a time, in recent years, the Britain's approach to China on matters such as Huawei or the human rights situation or alleged atrocities was being driven by MPs.

Methodological Variations and Persistent Cyber Risks

To a degree there are cultural differences as well. Autocratic regimes like Beijing's export information gathering methods and the scale of its intelligence apparatus is vast, employing three hundred thousand individuals. Chris Inglis, a US national cyber director under the US administration, said it was sometimes estimated that “the Chinese have greater linguistic capacity involved in this than Western agencies have personnel with language skills”.

Beijing is prepared to develop contacts over the extended period and at times even the agencies have struggled to distinguish between genuine connections and spying. “China has a low threshold for what information is considered to be of value,” security minister Dan Jarvis informed parliamentarians on this week, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may result in someone quickly marginal becomes important.

An alternative perspective to consider the relentless activities at secret intelligence collection is in the broader framework of the geopolitical contest between Beijing and the west at a threshold under the level of outright war. China has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the one campaign penetration of communications systems in 80 countries, and the another operation compromise of countless internet devices.

Chinese authorities is engaged in relentless efforts to identify covert sources on UK politics via digital means because it wants to be challenging, to demonstrate influence and because it can.