🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

In Europe, a growing number of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to enact a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," commented one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," stated a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various figures to mimic this example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, further states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this global debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.